<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surviving Google&#8217;s Landing Page &#8220;Quality&#8221; Score (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Insights and Thoughts from a World Class Internet Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue,  9 Mar 2010 18:36:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HerbalDistribuidor</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-15218</link>
		<dc:creator>HerbalDistribuidor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-15218</guid>
		<description>Well said. We know what google loves and what people are expecting from the website when they click on the ad. The problem I think is implementation, Its true that a good website needs many potential hands like website designer (good in CSS and google rules), content writer (with good knowledge in keyword research and implementing perfect keyword density), SEO person who can do listings and make constant updates on your blogs and website and above all a perfect person to manage your PPC campaigns etc. Don&#039;t worry  this is happening in every successful websites and we can make it happen too. Find perfect hands and start doing, BUT make sure you do it you can see the difference within weeks - guaranteed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. We know what google loves and what people are expecting from the website when they click on the ad. The problem I think is implementation, Its true that a good website needs many potential hands like website designer (good in CSS and google rules), content writer (with good knowledge in keyword research and implementing perfect keyword density), SEO person who can do listings and make constant updates on your blogs and website and above all a perfect person to manage your PPC campaigns etc. Don&#8217;t worry  this is happening in every successful websites and we can make it happen too. Find perfect hands and start doing, BUT make sure you do it you can see the difference within weeks &#8211; guaranteed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Refrigerators</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-8106</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Refrigerators</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-8106</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, it comes down to quality relevant content. Most affiliate sites tend to load the site with already widely available information on other sites. You need to approach things differently then your competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, it comes down to quality relevant content. Most affiliate sites tend to load the site with already widely available information on other sites. You need to approach things differently then your competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Heavy Hitters Do Adwords&#8230;Part III &#124; Super Affiliate Mindset</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-7520</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Heavy Hitters Do Adwords&#8230;Part III &#124; Super Affiliate Mindset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-7520</guid>
		<description>[...] Setup you affiliate site PROPERLY so that you start out with a good landing page quality score, I&#8217;m not going to go into the detail in this post, rather check out this post I did a while back on how to make your affiliate site Google happy! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Setup you affiliate site PROPERLY so that you start out with a good landing page quality score, I&#8217;m not going to go into the detail in this post, rather check out this post I did a while back on how to make your affiliate site Google happy! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s the Deal with Min Bid Prices on Google Anyway? &#124; Super Affiliate Mindset</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-7514</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s the Deal with Min Bid Prices on Google Anyway? &#124; Super Affiliate Mindset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-7514</guid>
		<description>[...] Landing Page Quality - I&#8217;ve talked about this one in depth, your landing page needs to be part of a real site, and have targeted content&#8217;s relevant to the keywords in your adgroup. Refer to this post, for more details. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Landing Page Quality &#8211; I&#8217;ve talked about this one in depth, your landing page needs to be part of a real site, and have targeted content&#8217;s relevant to the keywords in your adgroup. Refer to this post, for more details. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler DeWitt</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4381</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler DeWitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-4381</guid>
		<description>So in other words I have no problem getting QS scores of OK, but I&#039;m trying to get every keyword at GREAT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in other words I have no problem getting QS scores of OK, but I&#8217;m trying to get every keyword at GREAT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler DeWitt</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler DeWitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>Amit,

What do you think of a good quality score Vs Great I have been trying to get a great quality score on all my ad campaigns and  no more then 5 cents a click for online dating or maybe I&#039;m trying a little to hard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amit,</p>
<p>What do you think of a good quality score Vs Great I have been trying to get a great quality score on all my ad campaigns and  no more then 5 cents a click for online dating or maybe I&#8217;m trying a little to hard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4342</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-4342</guid>
		<description>I have been working on my site doing all the above steps and still no PR from Google in 4-5 months! I&#039;m serp-ing ok page 1 and 2 mostly. Is this normal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been working on my site doing all the above steps and still no PR from Google in 4-5 months! I&#8217;m serp-ing ok page 1 and 2 mostly. Is this normal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler DeWitt</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4168</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler DeWitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-4168</guid>
		<description>Amit, 

That post was so clear and well written I&#039;m being honest then you even showed an example site as I was asking questions in my head you was answering them through out the post and my biggest worry was a example site of what your referring to its a lot better to seen an image of what your talking about, but thats nice how hes got all the online dating sites on there and the thing is about that site someone might even book mark it or send it to there friend. 

I wonder how much money that site is making through ppc :)

Great post amit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amit, </p>
<p>That post was so clear and well written I&#8217;m being honest then you even showed an example site as I was asking questions in my head you was answering them through out the post and my biggest worry was a example site of what your referring to its a lot better to seen an image of what your talking about, but thats nice how hes got all the online dating sites on there and the thing is about that site someone might even book mark it or send it to there friend. </p>
<p>I wonder how much money that site is making through ppc <img src='http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Great post amit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>Three words -- Keyword Focused Content.  That&#039;s the only way any affiliate can continue to succeed no matter what Google does.  I find that through building lots of KFC on all my pages I get more organic traffic than traffic I have to pay for!  KFC is not that difficult to create -- it&#039;s just a bit time consuming -- but I&#039;m finding well worth the effort!  By the way, I&#039;m new to this site, but loving every word of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three words &#8212; Keyword Focused Content.  That&#8217;s the only way any affiliate can continue to succeed no matter what Google does.  I find that through building lots of KFC on all my pages I get more organic traffic than traffic I have to pay for!  KFC is not that difficult to create &#8212; it&#8217;s just a bit time consuming &#8212; but I&#8217;m finding well worth the effort!  By the way, I&#8217;m new to this site, but loving every word of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/surviving-googles-landing-page-quality-score-part-ii/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Here are my feelings on this:

Google has been pushing out businesses from the SERPs, favoring high content sites, wiki&#039;s and blogs over business / ecommerce pages for some time now.  The word was, &quot;If you&#039;re a business and want to be seen in Google, ya gotta pay for it.&quot;  OK, understandable...fine.

Now that they have businesses paying to be listed alongside the SERPs, they are now getting picky about who can show up there.  Not only must your ad receive click-thrus and your landing page be relevant, but you must have a full freakin website with it that is updated at a fairly frequent interval and has distracting outbound links and useful content.

Pardon my French, but fuck that and to hell with them.  Personally, I believe their superiority complex is going to come back and bite them.  Paid inclusion is paid inclusion.   The &quot;Do no evil&quot; mantra won&#039;t work in the real world.  Sorry Google, get your head out of the clouds before your profits start taking a tumble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are my feelings on this:</p>
<p>Google has been pushing out businesses from the SERPs, favoring high content sites, wiki&#8217;s and blogs over business / ecommerce pages for some time now.  The word was, &#8220;If you&#8217;re a business and want to be seen in Google, ya gotta pay for it.&#8221;  OK, understandable&#8230;fine.</p>
<p>Now that they have businesses paying to be listed alongside the SERPs, they are now getting picky about who can show up there.  Not only must your ad receive click-thrus and your landing page be relevant, but you must have a full freakin website with it that is updated at a fairly frequent interval and has distracting outbound links and useful content.</p>
<p>Pardon my French, but fuck that and to hell with them.  Personally, I believe their superiority complex is going to come back and bite them.  Paid inclusion is paid inclusion.   The &#8220;Do no evil&#8221; mantra won&#8217;t work in the real world.  Sorry Google, get your head out of the clouds before your profits start taking a tumble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
