<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Direct Linking Still Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/</link>
	<description>Insights and Thoughts from a World Class Internet Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue,  9 Mar 2010 18:36:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-46215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-46215</guid>
		<description>Arch,

If you can&#039;t find the answer on this blog or the google web master page, may I suggest this site.http://www.ppchero.com/quality-score-handbook/

I would think if you had 160 web sites that had at least
5 pages of content at a minimum. Content that is extremely targeted. Where the keywords are within the first 50 words of the post or page. With the URL derived from the targeted keywords (multi worded keywords, like burn-belly-fat.com) People sometimes tell not to use hypens in the URL , but the search engines love them. So you have a URL called burn-belly-fat.com, your site is only about &quot;burn belly fat&quot;. Set up some adsense on your site as well. If you could get a $1 a day from each site, then you maybe could be on your way. 

It seems like you have the drive it takes and as Tony Robbins says &quot;you have the must&quot; needed. And you have the resources in the 160 URL&#039;s. 

Adwords is just part of the game. SEO things like content, linking and back linking is needed as well.

Keep your adwords ads relevant to the web page (WEB PAGE) not just the whole site in general. IF you make a post or page about &quot;burning belly fat in 3 steps&quot; you need you ad to reflect that web page or post title.

&quot;Help Google to help you&quot;

Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arch,</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t find the answer on this blog or the google web master page, may I suggest this site.http://www.ppchero.com/quality-score-handbook/</p>
<p>I would think if you had 160 web sites that had at least<br />
5 pages of content at a minimum. Content that is extremely targeted. Where the keywords are within the first 50 words of the post or page. With the URL derived from the targeted keywords (multi worded keywords, like burn-belly-fat.com) People sometimes tell not to use hypens in the URL , but the search engines love them. So you have a URL called burn-belly-fat.com, your site is only about &#8220;burn belly fat&#8221;. Set up some adsense on your site as well. If you could get a $1 a day from each site, then you maybe could be on your way. </p>
<p>It seems like you have the drive it takes and as Tony Robbins says &#8220;you have the must&#8221; needed. And you have the resources in the 160 URL&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Adwords is just part of the game. SEO things like content, linking and back linking is needed as well.</p>
<p>Keep your adwords ads relevant to the web page (WEB PAGE) not just the whole site in general. IF you make a post or page about &#8220;burning belly fat in 3 steps&#8221; you need you ad to reflect that web page or post title.</p>
<p>&#8220;Help Google to help you&#8221;</p>
<p>Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archimedes</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-44057</link>
		<dc:creator>Archimedes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-44057</guid>
		<description>Vc4ntyas$&amp;%nett9w47

Hello Online Marketing Gurus,
I am posting this message to all the guru sites out there to get a final definitive answer to my frustration with google new rules. I really wish someone could help me. I have been researching and researching and reading and reading everything there is about adwords and I see so many people making so much money online. Yet after 10 years I never really “jumped into the pool” for fear of screwing up royally and losting a ton of money which my jobless unemployed ass has none.  I was this close to “jumping in the pool” with the rest of you people then all of a sudden the “Google Slap” came in. That just put more fear in me not to start this. I’m not here to become the next millionaire guru. I just want to survive in this economy. Plus my Severance Package is close to gone. So here are my questions and ANY help or comments will be appreciated. Thanks.

QUESTION NUMBER 1
Is DIRECT LINKING dead in relation to Google Adwords? There’s tons of post all over the net the says YES OR NO either or. Can I just get a definitive answer? Here’s what  know (or thought) I thought Google banned the use of direct linking? Gone are the days where people could just buy a domain (relevant or not to the item being promoted by the affialiate) and having the domain be redirected directly to the offer they are promoting using their domain control panel (and not using a redirect script on some hosted site). Is this still allowed? Or not?

Here’s what I do now direct from Google’s site that this is allowed:
For example:
Display URL: www.google.com/adwords
Destination URL: www.trackingurl.com/google123
--&gt; Landing page URL: www.google.com would be acceptable

Display URL: www.google.com/adwords
Destination URL: www.trackingurl.com/google123
--&gt; Landing page URL: www.trackingurl.com would not be acceptable

I understand that the Display URL and the Landing Page URL must be the same. This I have read countless times and it seems like that is all that Google cares about for now. But I heard somewhere now that even the Destination URL MUST MATCH the display and Landing page URL too. Is this true? I haven’t seen any changes concerning this change in the Google policy.

Question NUMBER 2:
  I read somewhere that Googles rules has change concerning also Landing Pages. From what I have read simply creating a Landing page with some content or perhaps the same rehashed marketing materials most affiliate programs provide their affiliates where most of the links go directly to their affiliate offers or CPA Offers or even clickbank products. Is it true that this technique is no longer applicable to Google Adwords?
Question number 3.: 
I have a great education related domain. For example purposes lets assume I owned: Education.com

Could I just sign up for a Education related affiliate program and get my affiliate tracking link from them? And then simply go into my control panel for my domain? (NOT MY WEBSITE) just the domain. And redirect from there my domain to affiliate link?

After doing that, how would I use Google Adwords then?

I would assume that I create a campaign using the domain as my display right? Ok and then also use it as my Landing Page URL and my destination URL?

Some part of me feels that this compaign would get banned or Google would rack up some obscene ppc charges to my account for my Click thru’s.

Am I right?

See my dilemma? This type of technique is no longer allowed is it? If so how?

Question 4: 
Is domain Aliasing DEAD? It seems to me with Googles new rules specifically the part where the Display URL MUST MATCH the Landing Page URL that Domain Aliasing is no longer allowed by Google? From what I know this technique basically is like this

All these domains ( each having it’s own respective Adwords Campaign)
Blue-widgets.com
Red-widgets.com
Green-widgets.com

All will point to : widgetsworld.com

How in the world could something like this work nowadays with Google’s new rules? This technique has to be dead now right?

What’s sooooo confusing about all the info the Gurus have floating on the internet is that there is soo much OUTDATED INFORMATION. I mean few days ago I was about to implement one or 2 techniques I heard about then I quickly thankfully glanced at the date the post was made and it was like 2005! Or 2007!

After realizing this I immediately stopped what I was doing and did more research and found nothing to say otherwise that the technique was valid or invalid or outdated. Is it safe to assume at that point that it is feasible technique(just because I can’t find any info to contradict it?)? Stuff like this really puts much doubt and fear in my head about all this business.

Question NUMBER 5:
Starting Today, Can someone with say 160 domains ( which I do own and are starting to lose because I have no money to keep them) make money using Adwords to promote products that my domains are relevant to? WITHOUT my own hosted website for any of my domains?

Or is purchasing a hosting plan THEE ONLY WAY to make money using Google Adwords?

PLEASE?!?!?!?! SOMEONE HELP??? I’m only about 3 rent checks away from being evicted over here…..so any kind of help would be appreciated. And please? No people hitting me up with some BS or just some way to give me OUTDATED INFO that is probably going to get me banned from Google. OK?? And yes people have done that or tried to. You have no idea how evil people can be these days. I’m going to put this tracking code to this message so I can find it via google later and so I can find some answers to these questions.

Vc4ntyas$&amp;%nett9w47
December 07, 2009
Archimedes S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vc4ntyas$&amp;%nett9w47</p>
<p>Hello Online Marketing Gurus,<br />
I am posting this message to all the guru sites out there to get a final definitive answer to my frustration with google new rules. I really wish someone could help me. I have been researching and researching and reading and reading everything there is about adwords and I see so many people making so much money online. Yet after 10 years I never really “jumped into the pool” for fear of screwing up royally and losting a ton of money which my jobless unemployed ass has none.  I was this close to “jumping in the pool” with the rest of you people then all of a sudden the “Google Slap” came in. That just put more fear in me not to start this. I’m not here to become the next millionaire guru. I just want to survive in this economy. Plus my Severance Package is close to gone. So here are my questions and ANY help or comments will be appreciated. Thanks.</p>
<p>QUESTION NUMBER 1<br />
Is DIRECT LINKING dead in relation to Google Adwords? There’s tons of post all over the net the says YES OR NO either or. Can I just get a definitive answer? Here’s what  know (or thought) I thought Google banned the use of direct linking? Gone are the days where people could just buy a domain (relevant or not to the item being promoted by the affialiate) and having the domain be redirected directly to the offer they are promoting using their domain control panel (and not using a redirect script on some hosted site). Is this still allowed? Or not?</p>
<p>Here’s what I do now direct from Google’s site that this is allowed:<br />
For example:<br />
Display URL: <a href="http://www.google.com/adwords" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/adwords</a><br />
Destination URL: <a href="http://www.trackingurl.com/google123" rel="nofollow">http://www.trackingurl.com/google123</a><br />
&#8211;&gt; Landing page URL: <a href="http://www.google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com</a> would be acceptable</p>
<p>Display URL: <a href="http://www.google.com/adwords" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/adwords</a><br />
Destination URL: <a href="http://www.trackingurl.com/google123" rel="nofollow">http://www.trackingurl.com/google123</a><br />
&#8211;&gt; Landing page URL: <a href="http://www.trackingurl.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.trackingurl.com</a> would not be acceptable</p>
<p>I understand that the Display URL and the Landing Page URL must be the same. This I have read countless times and it seems like that is all that Google cares about for now. But I heard somewhere now that even the Destination URL MUST MATCH the display and Landing page URL too. Is this true? I haven’t seen any changes concerning this change in the Google policy.</p>
<p>Question NUMBER 2:<br />
  I read somewhere that Googles rules has change concerning also Landing Pages. From what I have read simply creating a Landing page with some content or perhaps the same rehashed marketing materials most affiliate programs provide their affiliates where most of the links go directly to their affiliate offers or CPA Offers or even clickbank products. Is it true that this technique is no longer applicable to Google Adwords?<br />
Question number 3.:<br />
I have a great education related domain. For example purposes lets assume I owned: Education.com</p>
<p>Could I just sign up for a Education related affiliate program and get my affiliate tracking link from them? And then simply go into my control panel for my domain? (NOT MY WEBSITE) just the domain. And redirect from there my domain to affiliate link?</p>
<p>After doing that, how would I use Google Adwords then?</p>
<p>I would assume that I create a campaign using the domain as my display right? Ok and then also use it as my Landing Page URL and my destination URL?</p>
<p>Some part of me feels that this compaign would get banned or Google would rack up some obscene ppc charges to my account for my Click thru’s.</p>
<p>Am I right?</p>
<p>See my dilemma? This type of technique is no longer allowed is it? If so how?</p>
<p>Question 4:<br />
Is domain Aliasing DEAD? It seems to me with Googles new rules specifically the part where the Display URL MUST MATCH the Landing Page URL that Domain Aliasing is no longer allowed by Google? From what I know this technique basically is like this</p>
<p>All these domains ( each having it’s own respective Adwords Campaign)<br />
Blue-widgets.com<br />
Red-widgets.com<br />
Green-widgets.com</p>
<p>All will point to : widgetsworld.com</p>
<p>How in the world could something like this work nowadays with Google’s new rules? This technique has to be dead now right?</p>
<p>What’s sooooo confusing about all the info the Gurus have floating on the internet is that there is soo much OUTDATED INFORMATION. I mean few days ago I was about to implement one or 2 techniques I heard about then I quickly thankfully glanced at the date the post was made and it was like 2005! Or 2007!</p>
<p>After realizing this I immediately stopped what I was doing and did more research and found nothing to say otherwise that the technique was valid or invalid or outdated. Is it safe to assume at that point that it is feasible technique(just because I can’t find any info to contradict it?)? Stuff like this really puts much doubt and fear in my head about all this business.</p>
<p>Question NUMBER 5:<br />
Starting Today, Can someone with say 160 domains ( which I do own and are starting to lose because I have no money to keep them) make money using Adwords to promote products that my domains are relevant to? WITHOUT my own hosted website for any of my domains?</p>
<p>Or is purchasing a hosting plan THEE ONLY WAY to make money using Google Adwords?</p>
<p>PLEASE?!?!?!?! SOMEONE HELP??? I’m only about 3 rent checks away from being evicted over here…..so any kind of help would be appreciated. And please? No people hitting me up with some BS or just some way to give me OUTDATED INFO that is probably going to get me banned from Google. OK?? And yes people have done that or tried to. You have no idea how evil people can be these days. I’m going to put this tracking code to this message so I can find it via google later and so I can find some answers to these questions.</p>
<p>Vc4ntyas$&amp;%nett9w47<br />
December 07, 2009<br />
Archimedes S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-35239</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-35239</guid>
		<description>Today I&#039;m at the end of my tether, having had all my direct linking campaigns totally shut down over 4 weeks by Google. I don&#039;t know where to turn next or what to do. I have paid out a lot of money trying to buy the right domain names so that they will match the product URL. I then forwarded on from the domain site to the product site through my hoplinks. But nothing works. AdWords doesn&#039;t accept anything I do. 

Surely there are sites we can use other than Adwords? These b******s don&#039;t have the monopoly do they? Where am I going to earn enough to stay alive? I have zero website skills. I&#039;m getting in debt. Feel like giving up right now and stacking supermarket shelves. It&#039;s got to be less stressful that this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I&#8217;m at the end of my tether, having had all my direct linking campaigns totally shut down over 4 weeks by Google. I don&#8217;t know where to turn next or what to do. I have paid out a lot of money trying to buy the right domain names so that they will match the product URL. I then forwarded on from the domain site to the product site through my hoplinks. But nothing works. AdWords doesn&#8217;t accept anything I do. </p>
<p>Surely there are sites we can use other than Adwords? These b******s don&#8217;t have the monopoly do they? Where am I going to earn enough to stay alive? I have zero website skills. I&#8217;m getting in debt. Feel like giving up right now and stacking supermarket shelves. It&#8217;s got to be less stressful that this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12884</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-12884</guid>
		<description>I need to mention what i&#039;ve experienced with direct linking. I&#039;m pretty sure i&#039;ve found a way to do direct linking without getting slapped. I discovered this because I already had an established landing page for a campaign. After I realized google was shutting down direct linking &quot;so to speak&quot; I set the Display URL and the Landing URL to my own Landing page. Then all I did was edit my keywords and redirect every singe word straight to my affiliate offer. This has been working perfectly for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to mention what i&#8217;ve experienced with direct linking. I&#8217;m pretty sure i&#8217;ve found a way to do direct linking without getting slapped. I discovered this because I already had an established landing page for a campaign. After I realized google was shutting down direct linking &#8220;so to speak&#8221; I set the Display URL and the Landing URL to my own Landing page. Then all I did was edit my keywords and redirect every singe word straight to my affiliate offer. This has been working perfectly for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-9418</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-9418</guid>
		<description>I just started a direct link campaign with a clickbank product. I have the destination URL set to my domain/website and the display URL set to the same domain website. However, I only use this page on my site to capture information and track the clicks. The user is instantly re-directed (via PHP&#039;s header() ) to the merchants landing page.  When I uploading this campaign all of my ads were disapproved due to an incorrect display URL, even though the keywords are set to go to that URL. When I changed the display URL to match the merchant&#039;s landing page URL, the ads were approved.

DID NOT WORK:
Display URL: www.example.tld
Destination URL: www.mywebsite.tld/tracking-script.php
FInal URL: www.merchantwebsite.tld

DID WORK:
Display URL: www.merchantwebsite.tld
Destination URL: www.mywebsite.tld/tracking-script.php
FInal URL: www.merchantwebsite.tld

So this is consistent with google&#039;s editorial guidelines and what they say is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started a direct link campaign with a clickbank product. I have the destination URL set to my domain/website and the display URL set to the same domain website. However, I only use this page on my site to capture information and track the clicks. The user is instantly re-directed (via PHP&#8217;s header() ) to the merchants landing page.  When I uploading this campaign all of my ads were disapproved due to an incorrect display URL, even though the keywords are set to go to that URL. When I changed the display URL to match the merchant&#8217;s landing page URL, the ads were approved.</p>
<p>DID NOT WORK:<br />
Display URL: <a href="http://www.example.tld" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.tld</a><br />
Destination URL: <a href="http://www.mywebsite.tld/tracking-script.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.mywebsite.tld/tracking-script.php</a><br />
FInal URL: <a href="http://www.merchantwebsite.tld" rel="nofollow">http://www.merchantwebsite.tld</a></p>
<p>DID WORK:<br />
Display URL: <a href="http://www.merchantwebsite.tld" rel="nofollow">http://www.merchantwebsite.tld</a><br />
Destination URL: <a href="http://www.mywebsite.tld/tracking-script.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.mywebsite.tld/tracking-script.php</a><br />
FInal URL: <a href="http://www.merchantwebsite.tld" rel="nofollow">http://www.merchantwebsite.tld</a></p>
<p>So this is consistent with google&#8217;s editorial guidelines and what they say is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: victor</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-8269</link>
		<dc:creator>victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-8269</guid>
		<description>@Rafeal - Google requires landing page URL to be the same as display URL (at least the TLD), so they don&#039;t allow redirects from display &amp; destination url such as yourdomain.com to merchant.com

@frand - the one with higher bid

@affiliate dominator - yes, you&#039;re right on google ban on redirect. and I think the reason why amit brought up having your own site in this post is b/c he was mentioning the drawback of direct link. so to counter that drawback is having your own site. nothng else can be done.

@ianternet - I really want to do direct linking and in fact been searching a lot of merchants that allow direct linking (i mostly use CJ). However, what I found is most merchants don&#039;t allow affiliates use trademarks in display URL, that in essence means NO direct linking. Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong, if I put affiliate tracking URL in the destination URL and this goes to merchant.com, but I put any URL other than merchant.com in display, this act is banned by google and other search engines as well, isn&#039;t it. 

@joshua - googles does banned redirects, you can find out from their editorial guide. I think you have missed one point, that is when we say redirect in direct link PPC, it refers to redirect your destination URL, so it will be a different landing page URL than the actually display URL you put for the ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rafeal &#8211; Google requires landing page URL to be the same as display URL (at least the TLD), so they don&#8217;t allow redirects from display &amp; destination url such as yourdomain.com to merchant.com</p>
<p>@frand &#8211; the one with higher bid</p>
<p>@affiliate dominator &#8211; yes, you&#8217;re right on google ban on redirect. and I think the reason why amit brought up having your own site in this post is b/c he was mentioning the drawback of direct link. so to counter that drawback is having your own site. nothng else can be done.</p>
<p>@ianternet &#8211; I really want to do direct linking and in fact been searching a lot of merchants that allow direct linking (i mostly use CJ). However, what I found is most merchants don&#8217;t allow affiliates use trademarks in display URL, that in essence means NO direct linking. Please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, if I put affiliate tracking URL in the destination URL and this goes to merchant.com, but I put any URL other than merchant.com in display, this act is banned by google and other search engines as well, isn&#8217;t it. </p>
<p>@joshua &#8211; googles does banned redirects, you can find out from their editorial guide. I think you have missed one point, that is when we say redirect in direct link PPC, it refers to redirect your destination URL, so it will be a different landing page URL than the actually display URL you put for the ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler dewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-6562</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler dewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 07:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-6562</guid>
		<description>Amit,

Thanks Man!

I just tried direct linking on another merchant and I have been up all night long because its converting and my clicks are super cheap I wish I would of tested other offers awhile back. I have another offer I&#039;m promoting, but it just seems very expensive which my CPC cost is going down for that merchant, but it&#039;s taking a lot of spending optimization. 

But check this out I jumped into this other merchant direct link and it was like this one was super easy compared to the other one I&#039;m paying cheaper on my clicks, but the pay out on the merchant site is high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amit,</p>
<p>Thanks Man!</p>
<p>I just tried direct linking on another merchant and I have been up all night long because its converting and my clicks are super cheap I wish I would of tested other offers awhile back. I have another offer I&#8217;m promoting, but it just seems very expensive which my CPC cost is going down for that merchant, but it&#8217;s taking a lot of spending optimization. </p>
<p>But check this out I jumped into this other merchant direct link and it was like this one was super easy compared to the other one I&#8217;m paying cheaper on my clicks, but the pay out on the merchant site is high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>Joshua discussed the &quot;problem&quot; with direct linking and Googles new policy. He cited an excerpt from Googles own policy about redirects that essentially says that it is OK as long as the VERY FINAL destination is the URL that is also a display URL.

I am not saying that I don&#039;t believe you Joshua (I haven&#039;t read the whole document) but I have to say that Google support staff told me that they don&#039;t like redirects.

I am a web developer and I was launching a campaign for my client but his website URL was too long to put in the display URL field, so I have to contact the support. I told them I can do a redirect from his shorter URL but they said they don&#039;t like that. So eventually I got approved for some exception where my display URL isn&#039;t exactly the same as the destination URL, but no redirects are in use.

So I don&#039;t know what Google really wants :)) but I thought I would share this experience with you.

Also, the policy says it applies for &quot;new ads&quot;, thus I assume that if you have older ads running that don&#039;t complay then you are OK (but only until you edit them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joshua discussed the &#8220;problem&#8221; with direct linking and Googles new policy. He cited an excerpt from Googles own policy about redirects that essentially says that it is OK as long as the VERY FINAL destination is the URL that is also a display URL.</p>
<p>I am not saying that I don&#8217;t believe you Joshua (I haven&#8217;t read the whole document) but I have to say that Google support staff told me that they don&#8217;t like redirects.</p>
<p>I am a web developer and I was launching a campaign for my client but his website URL was too long to put in the display URL field, so I have to contact the support. I told them I can do a redirect from his shorter URL but they said they don&#8217;t like that. So eventually I got approved for some exception where my display URL isn&#8217;t exactly the same as the destination URL, but no redirects are in use.</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t know what Google really wants <img src='http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) but I thought I would share this experience with you.</p>
<p>Also, the policy says it applies for &#8220;new ads&#8221;, thus I assume that if you have older ads running that don&#8217;t complay then you are OK (but only until you edit them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>Hi Amit,

Same question as the others - do you offer a coaching program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amit,</p>
<p>Same question as the others &#8211; do you offer a coaching program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jes</title>
		<link>http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/comment-page-1/#comment-5996</link>
		<dc:creator>jes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superaffiliatemindset.com/does-direct-linking-still-work/#comment-5996</guid>
		<description>Hi Amit,

Iam using direct linking it&#039;s easy to test different niches very quickly and it&#039;s helpful if you are planning to do a information product. It&#039;s also the profitable way to test a market, rather than stuffs such as surveys, etc.
There are over 30,000 clickbank products, and some of them need to be worth doing a DL campaign, there are numerous niches where people are spending more money. So, it works for me, iam testing a lot of market and so far it&#039;s been profitable, and most of the time iam the only one promoting the product. When more people are promotign  the same product i get a seperate page for me from the vendor in some case a seperate subdomain. Hope it helps.

jes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amit,</p>
<p>Iam using direct linking it&#8217;s easy to test different niches very quickly and it&#8217;s helpful if you are planning to do a information product. It&#8217;s also the profitable way to test a market, rather than stuffs such as surveys, etc.<br />
There are over 30,000 clickbank products, and some of them need to be worth doing a DL campaign, there are numerous niches where people are spending more money. So, it works for me, iam testing a lot of market and so far it&#8217;s been profitable, and most of the time iam the only one promoting the product. When more people are promotign  the same product i get a seperate page for me from the vendor in some case a seperate subdomain. Hope it helps.</p>
<p>jes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
